Map the relationship
Record the legal entity, service, data access and business owner. Identify important subcontractors and dependencies.

USER JOURNEYS / FINANCIAL SERVICES
Connect the third party to the service it supports. Understand where a supplier failure could interrupt growth, customer trust or day-to-day operations.
ONE LIFECYCLE. SHARED RESPONSIBILITY.
Business teams provide the context. Risk and compliance assess exposure. Suppliers provide evidence. Accountable owners approve, monitor and plan for change.
Record the legal entity, service, data access and business owner. Identify important subcontractors and dependencies.
Link the supplier to customer-facing services. Assess the impact of disruption, data loss and limited substitutability.
Send a controlled questionnaire. Review evidence, financial context, control maturity and unresolved gaps.
Record an approval, conditions or a rejection. Assign remediation owners and appropriate contractual protections.
Use policy intervals and change signals to determine the next review. Explain the reason for each reassessment.
Test recovery options, alternative providers and exit plans. Preserve continuity as services and partnerships evolve.
CHOOSE YOUR BUSINESS CONTEXT
These illustrative journeys show how the same risk workflow supports different operating models. Responsibilities and requirements depend on your organisation and jurisdiction.
A bank introduces digital onboarding through an identity verification provider, a cloud platform and a screening service.
A clearer go-live decision, visible concentration risk and a recovery path that helps protect customer access.
Map identity capture, screening and account opening to their providers and subcontractors. Identify where the same cloud or data provider supports several services.
Customer identity and beneficial ownership checks support onboarding decisions. Separately, assess the reliability, security and governance of the providers performing those checks.
Ask for access controls, incident processes, recovery test results and relevant independent assurance. AI can help identify gaps; risk owners assess their significance.
Record unresolved issues, owners, contractual expectations and a fallback process. Reassess when the service changes, an incident occurs or evidence expires.
A credit union expands digital lending using a loan origination platform and an outsourced servicing partner.
More focused use of a small risk team’s time, clearer accountability and better visibility into services members depend on.
Identify which partner failures could delay lending, expose member information or interrupt account servicing. Scale the review to the relationship’s risk.
Review business model, financial condition, security controls and service responsibilities. Collect evidence proportionate to the criticality of the service.
Define internal approval and escalation responsibilities. Supplier automation supports the team; it does not transfer the institution’s accountability.
Track service issues, unresolved actions and reliance on shared providers. Reassess material changes and maintain a practical alternative or exit plan.
A leasing company grows through dealers, asset suppliers, valuation specialists and collection or recovery partners.
Better-informed partner selection and a clearer view of how delivery, servicing and recovery dependencies affect portfolio stability.
The lessee’s identity and credit assessment serve a different purpose from due diligence on a dealer or asset provider. Connect the records without treating the risks as identical.
Map delivery, maintenance, valuation and recovery to responsible partners. Identify concentrations by supplier, geography or asset category.
Review financial health, delivery capacity, data handling and supporting evidence. Flag missing assurance, weak recovery arrangements or conflicts requiring investigation.
A new dealer network, larger volumes, delayed deliveries or a change of ownership can justify a targeted review before increasing dependency.
RELATED CONTEXT. DISTINCT DECISIONS.
Use shared entity context while keeping the purpose, evidence and accountable decision-maker clear. TPRM complements customer due diligence; it does not replace it.
| Decision | KYB / KYC context | TPRM context |
|---|---|---|
| Who are we dealing with? | Customer identity, legal entity and beneficial ownership where applicable. | Supplier identity, ownership, service scope and subcontractor relationships. |
| What must we understand? | The relationship’s purpose and relevant customer due diligence risk. | Operational, cyber, financial and other risks created by supplier dependency. |
| What evidence supports the decision? | Verified identity and entity information, with further checks proportionate to risk. | Control evidence, assurance reports, recovery tests, financial context and service performance. |
| What happens when something changes? | Review the customer relationship under the applicable due diligence process. | Reassess supplier exposure, conditions, remediation and continuity options. |
KYB/KYC data can inform entity context. This showcase does not perform identity verification, sanctions screening, AML monitoring or credit underwriting.
FROM SUPPLIER RISK TO BUSINESS IMPACT
An unavailable provider can delay onboarding, payments or servicing. Map affected services, define tolerances and test recovery or substitution.
Protect service availability and trust.Unverified access controls or missing recovery evidence can leave risk hidden. Use source-linked findings and named remediation owners.
Make risk acceptance explicit.Faster expansion can increase concentration and switching costs. Assess partner capacity and exit options before volumes grow.
Grow with informed guardrails.The journeys are illustrative. These primary sources provide context; applicability depends on the institution and jurisdiction.
YOUR NEXT JOURNEY STARTS WITH CONTEXT